PRIMENA WASPAS METODE U ANALIZI PERFORMANSI PREDUZEĆA U SRBIJI KOTIRANIH NA BEOGRADSKOJ BERZI

Autori

Ključne reči:

tržišna kapitalizacija, profit po akciji (EPS), odnos cene i profita po akciji (P/E), odnos tržišne i knigovodstvene vrednosti (P/B), prinos od kapitala (ROE), efektna berza.

Apstrakt

U poslednje vreme, kao što je poznato, sve se više koriste različite metode višekriterijumske analize u evaluaciji performansi preduzeća iz svih sektora. One se mogu uspešno koristiti u rangiranju preduzeća – emitenata (izdavalaca, prodavaca) hartija od vrednosti (akcija) prema berzanskim pokazateljima, u vidu korišćenih kriterijuma na efektnim berzama. To omogućuje bolji uvid u konkuretntnost preduzeća – emitenata akacija na efektnim berzama. Isto tako, potencijalni investitori (kupci) su u mogućnosti da bolje sagledaju ekonomsku isplativost ulaganja u akcije određenenih preduzeća. U ovom radu, to je ilustrovano i potvrđeno na primeru primene WASPAS metode u rangiranju preduzeća u Srbiji iz finansijske delatnosti i delatnosti osiguranja kotiranih na Beogradskoj berzi prema berzanskim pokazateljima kao kriterijumima. Dobijeni rezultati empirijskog istraživanja su nedvosmisleno pokazali da primena WASPAS metode daje daleko pouzdanije rezultate za investiciono odlučivanje u odnosu na racio analizu.

Reference

Chakraborty, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Applications of WASPAS method in manufacturing decision making. Informatica, 25(1), pp. 1- 20.

Chavas, J., & Aiiber, M. (1993). An Analysis of Economic Efficiency in Agriculture: A Nonparametric Approach. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 18, pp. 1-16.

Ersoy, N. (2022a). Türk İnşaat Firmalarının Finansal Performansının SECA Yöntemi ileDeğerlendirilmesi, İzmir İktisat Dergisi. 37(4), pp. 1003-1021. Doi: 10.24988/ije.1065282

Ersoy, N. (2022b). OECD ülkelerinin inovasyon performansinin ölçülmesi: çkkv yöntemleri ile karşilaştirmali bir analiz/Measuring innovation performance of OECD countries: a comparative analysis of mcdm methods. August 2022. Conference: Atlas 9th International Social Sciences Congress. At: Spain Barcelona, pp. 81-92.

Hafezalkotob, A., Hami-Dindar, A., Rabie, N., & Hafezalkotob, A. (2018). A decision support system for agricultural machines and equipment selection: A case study on olive harvester machines. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 148, pp. 207-216.

Jing, D., Imeni, M., Edalatpanah, S.A., Alburaikan, A., & Khalifa, H.A.E.-W. (2023). OptimalSelection of Stock Portfolios UsingMulti-Criteria Decision-MakingMethods. Mathematics, 11, p. 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020415

Kolagar, M. (2019). Adherence to Urban Agriculture in Order to Reach Sustainable Cities; a BWM–WASPAS Approach. Smart Cities, 2, pp. 31–45.

Kutlu, G. F., & Kahraman, C. (2019). Extension of WASPAS with spherical fuzzy sets. Informatica, 30(2), pp. 269–292.

Lukić, R. (2010). Revizija u bankama. Beograd: Ekonomski fakultet.

Lukić, R. (2018). Bankarsko računovodstvo. Beograd: Ekonomski fakultet.

Lukić, R., & Hadrović Zekić, B. (2019). Evaluation of efficiency of trade companies in Serbia using the DEA approach. Proceedings of the 19th International Scientific Conference Business Logistics In Modern Management, October 10-11, Osijek, Croatia, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics in Osijek, pp. 145-165.

Lukić, R., Hadrović Zekić, B., & Crnjac Milić, D. (2020a). Financial performance evaluation of trading companies in Serbia using the integrated Fuzzy AHP - TOPSIS Approach. 9thInternational Scientific Symposium Region, Entrepreneurship, Development, Under the auspices of: Republic Of Croatia Ministry Of Science And Education, Osijek, June, pp. 690-703.

Lukić, R., Vojteški Kljenak, D., & Anđelić, S. (2020b). Analyzing financial performances and efficiency of the retail food in Serbia by using the AHP – TOPSIS method. Economics of Agriculture, Year 67, No. 1, 2020, pp. 55-68, Belgrade.

Lukić, R. (2020c). Analysis of the efficiency of trade in oil derivatives in Serbia by applying the fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method. Business Excellence and Management, 10 (3), pp. 80-98.

Lukić, R., Hanić, H., and Bugarčić, M. (2020d), Analysis of Profitability and Efficiency of Trade in Serbia. Economic Analysis, 53(2), pp. 39-50.

Lukić, R. (2020e). Analysis of food retail efficiency in Serbia. Maso International, 1, pp. 7-16.

Lukić, R., Vojteški Kljenak, D., Anđelic, S., & Gavilović, M. (2021a). Application WASPAS method in the evaluation of efficiency of agricultural enterprises in Serbia. Economics of Agriculture, Year 68, No. 2, (pp. 375-388), Belgrade.

Lukić, R. (2021b). Analysis of the efficiency of insurance companies by lines of insurance in serbia using the COCOSO method. Insurance Trends, 2, pp. 24-38. DOI: 10.5937/TokOsig2102009L

Lukić, R. (2021c). Application of MABAC Method in Evaluation of Sector Efficiency in Serbia. Review of International Comparative Management, 22(3), pp. 400-417. DOI: 10.24818/RMCI.2021.3.400

Lukić, R. (2021d). Analiza efikasnosti preduzeća na bazi OCRA metode. Tehnika, 76(1), str. 103-111. DOI: 10.5937/tehnika2101103L

Lukić, R. (2021e). Application of ARAS method in assessing efficiency of insurance companies in Serbia. Insurance Trends, 3, pp. 23-36. DOI: 10.5937/tokosig2103009F

Lukić, R. (2021f). Application of the EDAS method in the evaluation of bank efficiency in Serbia. Bankarstvo – Banking, 50(2), str. 13-24. doi: 10.5937/bankarstvo2102064L

Lukić, R. (2022). Evaluation of the efficiency of banks in Serbia using the MABAC method. Bankarstvo – Banking , 2, pp. 35-60. DOI: 10.5937/bankarstvo2202010L

Petrović, G., Mihajlović, J., Cojbašic, Ž., Madić, M., & Marinković, D. (2019). Comparison of three fuzzy MCDM methods for solving the supplier selection problem. Facta Univ. Ser. Mech. Eng., 17, pp. 455–469.

Saaty,T. L. (2008). Decision Making With The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int J Serv Sci, 1(1), pp. 83-98.

Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D., Popović, G., Stanimirovic, P. S., Smarandache, F., Saracevic, M., Ulutas, A., & Katsikis, V.N. (2021). An Innovative Grey Approach for Group Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Based on the Median of Ratings by Using Python. Axioms, 10, pp. 124, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ axioms10020124

Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., & Kosareva, K. (2015). A Hybrid Model Based on Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS for Construction Site Selection. International Journal Of Computers Communications & Control, 10(6), pp. 113-128.

Urosevic, S., Karabasevic, D., Stanujkic, D., and Maksimovic, M. (2017). An Approach Personel Selection in the Tourism Indystry Based on the SWARA and the WASPAS Methods. Economic computation and economic cybernetics studies and research, 51(1), pp. 75-88.

Vojteški Kljenak, D. & Lukić, R. (2022). Evaluacija efikasnosti davalaca finansijskog lizinga u Srbiji. Glasnik društvenih nauka - Journal of Social Sciences, Vol 14 No XIV, str. 113-144.

Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J., & Zakarevicius, A. (2012). Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment. Electronics and Electrical engineering, 6(122), str. 3-6.

Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Saparauskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2013a). Multi-criteria assessment of facades’ alternatives: peculiarities of ranking methodology. Procedia Engineering, 57, pp. 107-112.

Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Saparauskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2013b). MCDM methods WASPAS and MULTIMOORA: verification of robustness of methods when assessing alternative solutions. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 47(2), pp. 5-20.

Zhang, H., Guo S., Qian Y., Liu Y., & Lu, C. (2020). Dynamic analysis of agricultural carbon emissions efficiency in Chinese provinces along the Belt and Road. PLoS ONE, 15(2): e0228223. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228223.

##submission.downloads##

Objavljeno

2023-12-27